Comments on: Petition to abandon plans to build an Eco-town in Elsenham

By: iphone games music

iphone games music — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:06:04 +0000

Nice blog, i have added it to my favourites, greetings

By: Mrs A Johnson

Mrs A Johnson — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:13:30 +0000

I am totally opposed to the eco-twon in Elsenham. The character of villages will be destroyed and the area will become an urban sprawl. There is no demand for such housing in the area and the infrastructure of the roads cannot support it now . There is no provision for primary school children in the plans and our schools are already full. The railway service is already stretched and this would only make matters worse. Building right next to an airport cannot be a good idea from the point of view of the air quality.There is no provision for other supermarkets to come into this area other then Tesco,s which at Great Dunmow cannot cope with the demand on it already.To go any where by bus takes nearly all day, as on some routes you are required to go into the airport to change buses.Therefore people use their cars to go any where , more houses would mean more cars on the roads.
With other 4,200 houses originally allocated to Uttlesford we would then have 9,200 houses in these area .
I an stronley against this development.

By: Mr E A Stanley

Mr E A Stanley — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:07:45 +0000

39 Vernons Close
Henham
CM22 6AF

By: Caroline Buckley

Caroline Buckley — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:21:48 +0000

Please register me as totally opposed to the eco-twon in Elsenham. The character of villages will be destroyed and the area will become an urban sprawl. There is no demand for such housing in the area and the infrastructure of the roads cannot support it. There is no provision for primary school children in the plans and our schools are already full. The railway service is already stretched and this would only make matters worse. Also building right next to an airport cannot be a good idea from the point of view of the air quality. Please register my vote against this development.